Decision 1 of 12
When should our kid get a phone?
The short answer
Later than feels comfortable, and later than your kid will accept without protest. Forget how old she is for a moment and ask what problem you are actually solving. Almost every first phone is bought to solve logistics: knowing where a kid is, reaching her after practice, letting her call home. A smartphone solves that problem at enormous cost. A watch or a call-only handset solves the same problem at almost none. Wait until the problem you have requires a phone, then buy the least capable device that solves it.
Start here
Separate the logistics from the smartphone. Get a watch or a call-only device for contact, and keep the internet out of your kid's pocket for now.
For families who need to reach their kid today and are tired of being the only holdout.
Going further
Hold the line to the end of middle school, and say so out loud to the other parents in your kid's year. The isolation argument collapses the moment three families agree.
For families who have some room to organize and would rather change the norm than fight it.
All the way
No personally owned internet-connected device until high school. Shared family devices live in shared rooms, and contact runs through a watch or a landline.
For families who are ready to be unusual, and would rather absorb the social cost early than unwind a habit later.
Ask a better question
“What age should she get a phone” has no answer, which is why every article about it disappoints you. Maturity is not a birthday. The question that does have an answer is this one: what specific problem are we trying to solve, and what is the smallest device that solves it?
Write down the actual problem. Most families find it is one of three things: Your kid walks home and you want to know she arrived. Practice ends at unpredictable times and she needs to call. Her friends organize their social lives somewhere and she is missing it.
The first two are logistics with cheap answers. The third is real and deserves a real response, but it is not solved by handing over a device with an open internet connection and no plan.
Why we lean late
Time is finite. This is the part of the argument that does not depend on any contested research: an hour on a phone is an hour not spent doing something else, and at this age the something else matters a great deal. Unstructured play in early childhood predicts stronger self-regulation years later, a capacity that tracks with health, school and financial outcomes across a lifetime.
Sleep is the clearest single finding in this whole field. When researchers looked at what actually drives the link between screens and sleep in children, it was portable devices, the ones that follow a kid into the bedroom and into the bed. That is a specific, fixable problem, and it is the reason the charger belongs in the kitchen, no matter what you decide about the phone itself.
Reading is the other place the evidence is unusually clear. Across dozens of studies, children understood and remembered more from paper than from the same text on a screen.
We will be straight with you about the part that is not settled. Whether smartphones and social media are driving the rise in teenage anxiety and depression is disputed among serious researchers, and the honest summary is that nobody has proved it either way. You do not need that argument to justify waiting. The case for a later phone influences childhood, and it stands whether or not the causal fight ever settles.
What this looks like in daily life
The device that solves logistics is a watch or a call-only handset, and the whole setup takes an afternoon.
Contact list is approved contacts only. The device charges in a shared room overnight, and so does yours, because a rule that applies to one person in the house is a rule that will be argued about every night. If there is a smartphone in the house at all, it belongs to the family and to no child in particular, it lives in a shared room, and it gets used with someone else present.
Say the plan out loud before you need it: “You will get a phone. Not this year.” That’s a completely different conversation from an argument that starts at the moment of refusal.
What to say
When she says everyone has one:
“Some of them do. I know that is hard, and I am not pretending it isn’t. Here is what I am worried about, and here is what we are doing instead…”
When she says you don’t trust her:
“I trust you. I don’t trust an app built by a company that makes money when you can’t put it down. Those are different things, and the second one isn’t about you.”
When you have already said yes and want to walk it back:
“I got this wrong. I gave you something before either of us had a plan for it, and fixing the problem is my responsibility. You did nothing wrong.”
That last one works better than pretending the first decision was correct.
When this doesn’t apply
Some families need a phone earlier and should not feel bad about it – split custody where a kid needs to reach the other parent privately, a medical condition that needs monitoring, a long solo commute, a disabled kid for whom a phone is an access tool rather than a toy, a caregiving situation where the child is the one being relied on.
If that is you, the advice does not change so much as compress: buy the least capable device that does the job, keep it out of the bedroom at night, and start the conversations earlier rather than later.
Talk about it
Rules do half the work. Conversations do the other half.
Conversation
Why you're seeing thisNothing on a screen got there by accident. A company chose it, usually to make money by making you keep looking.
Conversation
Designed to be hard to put downThe difficulty you feel stopping was engineered by people who are very good at their jobs. It is not a flaw in you.
Conversation
Who is actually on the other endOnline, you cannot tell who you are talking to, and increasingly you cannot tell whether it is a person at all.
If you decided to buy something
Only worth reading once you have made the call above. Nothing here is required, and the cheapest answer to most of these problems is no purchase at all.
Sources
Colliver, Harrison, Brown & Humburg. Free play predicts self-regulation years later: Longitudinal evidence from a large Australian sample of toddlers and preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2022. Time spent in unstructured free play in the early years predicted stronger self-regulation years later. That capacity tracks with health, educational and financial outcomes across a lifetime.
Odgers, C. L.. The great rewiring: is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness?. Nature, 2024. The serious version of the counter-argument. Odgers, reviewing The Anxious Generation, argues the evidence does not show social media causing an epidemic of teenage mental illness and that the likely causes sit elsewhere. Cited so that when these pages say the question is disputed, the dispute is between named researchers on both sides.
Twenge, Hisler & Krizan. Associations between screen time and sleep duration are primarily driven by portable electronic devices. Sleep Medicine, 2019. In a population sample of US children aged 0–17, the screen-time and sleep relationship was driven mainly by portable devices, the ones that follow a child into the bedroom, rather than by screens in general.
Furenes, Kucirkova & Bus. A Comparison of Children's Reading on Paper Versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2021. Across 39 studies of roughly 1,800 children aged 1–8, comprehension was lower for digital books than paper books when digitisation was the only difference. Digital books built with story-congruent enhancements did better than plain ports.
Thorp. Unsettled science on social media. Science, 2024.Disputed An editorial in Science on the unresolved state of the field. Large analyses have not found consistent associations between social media use and wellbeing, and where links appear, the direction of causation remains open.